Center-2279300 Essays - Human Resource Management, Business, Economy

Center-2279300 Essays - Human Resource Management, Business, Economy center-2279300 Location: Astana Course Code: HRM601 Course Name: Human Resource Management Professor: John W. Rogers Student(s) Name(s) : Akylbek Kalymzhan Cable Wireless case (2012) 1/ In your opinion, what should be the weaknesses of such a Group on the human side of business? Use disclosed facts as well as psycho-sociological and strategic elements to formulate your assessment. I would like to describe three main weaknesses of such a Group, which directly and indirectly influence the human side. In the part "The Strength of the Group" was written the actions of the company for the last several years, during this period company had aggressive strategy, because they were in process of acquiring the companies. In fact, it was a period of growth or MA period. As a result of MA, organization usually is enormously affected from the human side. First, company reduces its staff to be more efficient and effective, so layoff of superfluous employees is unavoidable. So, I think that CW fired people not only to meet financial results, but also to achieve managerial and strategic goals. Thousands of people lost their job, but this is not the worst if we consider this action from the point of management. The highest risk is a loss of key talented employees. Another one is diminished trust and uncertainty among workers. Second are different corporate cultures and management styles. Moreover, we do not know is there corporate culture or values in CW. Probably they do not have because company is young. Also, we do not know the mission and vision of the company, is there something what really drives people or motivate them to do something valuable. Third, new rules and procedures should be created, it can be rules of acquiring or acquired company or mix, but anyway employees will be affected by new policies. 2/ What is, in your point of view, the possible impact of their strategic alliances and partnership policy on the staff members? What are the inherent risks for any organization in this high-tech context? The strategic alliances and partnership policy has both advantages and disadvantages. First, knowledge exchange - employees from different partner companies can learn from each other. Second, exchange of technology - in highly competitive environment is good to have partners to implement new technologies or mastering them. On the other hand, there are some risks. Exchange of knowledge and technologies sometimes means information leak, the market is very competitive and new ideas can be stolen. Also, there is a risk of a loss of talented employees, because they can move to the partner's company. 3/ C W are recruiting and selecting a vast majority of young employees. What are the basics of a promotion/retention policy to manage and keep them? What do you do with left-over senior members? The management of the compa ny does a lot to keep employees; they do not eliminate costs on salaries or development . Their reward policy is good, because competitive with market standards and they offer different packages depending on the perform ance. Based on the performance, employees can be promoted. The promotion in the company is thoughtful and management always internally promotes employees. The retention policy for seniors and directors is good also, because benefit from shares or stock options. 4/ Describe in detail and analyze the impact of free access to Unions and possible quality of relationships within this UK organization. Justify your answers referring to the course and communication/information rules. Free access to Unions has pros and cons for company. Employees, who joined Unions, can have higher salary and legally allowed doing actions such as strikes . C ompany can decrease HR control, because promotion in the company based on the performance, but unions can make rules for such cases and instead of the most talented employee, company will be pushed to promote based on the other parameters rather than productivity or effectiveness. On the other hand, it is simpler to negotiate, because management should not communicate with everyone, and it is faster and more efficient. The level of employees' satisfaction is higher, because they have package of benefits: higher salary, protectiveness, better insurance etc. 5/ How do you imagine training and development needs in such an environment?

An Overview of The Treaty of Versailles

An Overview of The Treaty of Versailles Signed on June 28, 1919, as an end to the First World War, The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to ensure a lasting peace by punishing Germany and setting up a League of Nations to solve diplomatic problems. Instead, it left a legacy of political and geographical difficulties that have often been blamed, sometimes solely, for starting the Second World War. Background World War I had been fought for four years when, on November 11, 1918, Germany and the Allies signed an armistice. The Allies soon gathered to discuss the peace treaty they would sign, but Germany and Austria-Hungary werent invited; instead, they were allowed only to present a response to the treaty, a response that was largely ignored. Instead, terms were drawn up mainly by the so-called Big Three: British Prime Minister Lloyd George, French Prime Minister Frances Clemenceau, and U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. The Big Three Each government represented by the men in the the Big Three had different desires: Woodrow Wilson wanted a fair and lasting peace and had written a plan- the Fourteen Points- to achieve this. He wanted the armed forces of all nations reduced, not just the losers, and a League of Nations created to ensure peace.Frances Clemenceau wanted Germany to pay dearly for the war, including being stripped of land, industry, and its armed forces. He also wanted heavy reparations.Lloyd George was affected by public opinion in Britain, which agreed with Clemenceau, though he personally agreed with Wilson. The result was a treaty that tried to compromise, and many of the details were passed down to uncoordinated subcommittees to work out, who thought they were drafting a starting point rather than the final wording. It was an almost impossible task. They were asking for the ability to pay off loans and debts with German cash and goods but also to restore the pan-European economy. The treaty needed to state territorial demands- many of which were included in secret treaties- but also to allow self-determination and deal with growing nationalism. It also needed to remove the German threat but not humiliate the nation and breed a generation intent on revenge- all while mollifying voters.   Selected Terms of the Treaty of Versailles Here are some of the terms of the Versailles Treaty, in several main categories. Territory Alsace-Lorraine, captured by Germany in 1870 and the war aim of the attacking French forces in 1914, was returned to France.The Saar, an important German coalfield, was to be given to France for 15 years, after which a plebiscite would decide ownership.Poland became an independent country with a route to the sea, a corridor of land cutting Germany in two.Danzig, a major port in East Prussia (Germany) was to be under international rule.All German and Turkish colonies were taken away and put under Allied control.Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Czechoslovakia were made independent.Austria-Hungary was split up, and Yugoslavia was created. Arms The left bank of the Rhine was to be occupied by Allied forces and the right bank demilitarized.The German army was cut to 100,000 men.Wartime weapons were to be scrapped.The German Navy was cut to 36 ships and no submarines.Germany was banned from having an Air Force.An Anschluss (union) between Germany and Austria was banned. Reparations and Guilt In the war guilt clause, Germany has to accept total blame for the war.Germany had to pay  £6,600 million in compensation. The League of Nations A League of Nations was to be created to prevent further world conflict. Results Germany lost 13 percent of its land, 12 percent of its people, 48 percent of its iron resources, 15 percent of its agricultural production, and 10 percent of its coal. Perhaps understandably, German public opinion soon swung against this diktat (dictated peace), while the Germans who signed it were called the November Criminals. Britain and France felt the treaty was fair- they actually wanted harsher terms imposed on the Germans- but the United States refused to ratify it because it didnt want to be part of the League of Nations. Other results include: The map of Europe was redrawn with consequences which, especially in the Balkans, remain to the modern day.Numerous countries were left with large minority groups: There were three and a half million Germans in Czechoslovakia alone.The League of Nations was fatally weakened without the United States and its army to enforce decisions.Many Germans felt unfairly treated. After all, they had just signed an armistice, not a unilateral surrender, and the Allies hadnt occupied deeply into Germany. Modern Thoughts Modern historians sometimes conclude that the treaty was more lenient than might have been expected and not really unfair. They argue that, although the treaty didnt stop another war, this was more due to massive fault lines in Europe that WWI failed to solve, and they argue that the treaty would have worked had the Allied nations enforced it, instead of falling out and being played off one another. This remains a controversial view. You rarely find a modern historian agreeing that the treaty solely caused World War II, although clearly, it failed in its aim to prevent another major war. What is certain is that Adolf Hitler was able to use the treaty perfectly to rally support behind him: appealing to soldiers who felt conned and wielding the anger at the November Criminals to damn other socialists, promise to overcome Versailles, and make headway in doing so. However, supporters of Versailles like to look at the peace treaty Germany imposed on Soviet Russia, which took vast areas of land, population, and wealth, and point out that country was no less keen to grab things. Whether one wrong justifies another is, of course, down to the perspective of the reader.